Reporting tools tell you what happened. This tells you what happens next.
Forecasting is the product, not a module
Most FP&A tools are reporting platforms with a forecast added later. They run the same direction the books run, which is backwards if what you need to know is what happens next. Clockwork is built forecast-first on a live three-statement model, and the reporting falls out of that.
.png)
.png)
Mira does the assembly, you do the judgment
Variance commentary is the part of the month that eats the most hours for the least credit. Mira drafts it from your live ledger, and every figure traces back to the transaction behind it. You review the analysis instead of assembling it.
Nothing to build before you get an answer
No chart of accounts to map, no templates to fill in, no implementation call to schedule. Connect QuickBooks or Xero and the forecast, the dashboard, and the three-statement model build themselves in about five minutes.
Built to forecast, not just report
A cash forecast is only as good as the balance sheet behind it. Receivables convert on their own timing and payables land on theirs, so a model that does not carry both forward is guessing at the two things that actually move the cash position. Clockwork runs both together.
Weekly cash flow, not monthly
Point cash tools get weekly timing but have no balance sheet. Reporting platforms have a balance sheet but forecast cash monthly. A monthly view tells you roughly where you are. It does not tell you whether you make payroll on the 15th.
We will tell you when we are not the answer
If a lender is reading the output, covenant tracking elsewhere is the safer call. If you are building a bespoke driver model for one client paying you properly to do it, there are deeper tools for that. Our comparison pages name them. What we do is the recurring forecast.
